http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2013-01-07 13:06:16 UTC ---
> --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-07
> 12:55:39 UTC ---
> But that is not a requirement. The requirement is using a C++ compiler that
> works out of the box (compiler configured in a path where its shared libraries
> aren't found by the dynamic linker isn't), or making sure through
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH or tweaking spec (to add -rpath) that the compiler works out
> of
> the box, or compiler which supports -static-libstdc++.
But that first part (every single user of executables built with a g++
installed into non-system directories having to tweak LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
gcc builders/installers having to tweak specs or whatever) has been a
major shortcoming of gcc for years. There needs to be a way that gcc
DTRT out of the box; a compiler producing executables that don't work
without prior additional setup is a joke. Maybe I can work on this in
the 4.9 timeframe.
Rainer
