http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-04 18:58:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > You are right, but then I don't understand why we should compute __e *before* > checking __t == __x, per your first patch (I think I managed to confuse myself Indeed.
