http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-18 22:21:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > The original patch was the patch you reverted in comment #1 and the fix for > the > original issue. As far as I can see, you didn't put it back after installing > the blockage patch, which is the patch in comment #5. The dse.c and cselib.c > hunks were not necessary and not in the submission, but I asked you to add > them > for the sake of consistency; then Jakub pointed out that they pessimize > volatile asms. Thanks for clarifying, I (think I) get it now. Not sure when I can revisit, maybe this month, maybe the next, so I won't feel bad if someone beats me to it.
