http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
--- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ok, new theory. Does this patch fix it for you:
Index: varasm.c
===================================================================
--- varasm.c (revision 199270)
+++ varasm.c (working copy)
@@ -6052,7 +6052,7 @@ default_no_named_section (const char *na
{
/* Some object formats don't support named sections at all. The
front-end should already have flagged this as an error. */
- gcc_unreachable ();
+ gcc_assert (0);
}
#ifndef TLS_SECTION_ASM_FLAG