http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45318
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) > Any specific examples? I looked now through the code (for INTRINSIC_PARENTHESES) and glanced at some of the related PRs. I failed to find a case where one could do something in the FE - and the ME already handles it. (An example would be "(a+5)-7" - however, the ME essentially ignores all code involving nonconstants; the only exception is dependency tracing and there such a case is also unlikely.) In summary, while there could be in principle a case, which should be handled, in practice, there does not seem to be one. Thus: Close as WORKSFORME.