http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58154

Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> ---
There is no linkage conflict here.  The definition inherits the internal
linkage of the preceding declaration, so the resulting linkage is internal. 
See 6.2.2 #4 and #5.  Don't confuse the concept of linkage with storage-class
specifiers.

Reply via email to