http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58332
Bug ID: 58332
Summary: error: inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors
found
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
The following testcase:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
static inline int foo (int x) { return x + 1; }
__attribute__ ((__optimize__ (0))) int bar (void) { return foo (100); }
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICEs after r202187 with:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
foo.c:2:71: error: inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found
__attribute__ ((__optimize__ (0))) int bar (void) { return foo (100); }
^
_ZL3fooi/0 (int foo(int)) @0x7f6911eac000
Type: function definition analyzed
Visibility: prevailing_def_ironly
References:
Referring:
Function int foo(int)/0 is inline copy in int bar()/1
Availability: local
Function flags: body local
Called by:
Calls:
/tmp/foo.c:2:71: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed
0x918f05 verify_cgraph_node(cgraph_node*)
/home/richards/gcc/wide-int/gcc/gcc/cgraph.c:2866
0x910531 verify_symtab_node(symtab_node_def*)
/home/richards/gcc/wide-int/gcc/gcc/symtab.c:772
0x910598 verify_symtab()
/home/richards/gcc/wide-int/gcc/gcc/symtab.c:789
0x921389 compile()
/home/richards/gcc/wide-int/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2146
0x9214b1 finalize_compilation_unit()
/home/richards/gcc/wide-int/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2209
0x697554 cp_write_global_declarations()
/home/richards/gcc/wide-int/gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c:4364
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not saying we did the right thing before that either,
just that it didn't ICE :-)
