http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |3dw4rd at verizon dot net
--- Comment #5 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
complex.h
---------
...
#define _Complex_I (__extension__ 1.0iF)
...
So yes, this looks to C++11 etc. like a user-defined literal suffix. Except
that the user-defined literal suffix interpretation is supposed to let standard
suffixes and implementation-defined suffixes get first crack. Maybe there's a
hole in that logic?
Now figure out what __extension__ does and see if it can be used somehow to
intercept the usual suffix processing? That just suppresses -pedantic.
Just thinking aloud. I'm on it.
