http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59520
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > The main concerns for diagnostics in such cases are (a) that they are > > meaningful and (b) that invalid code gets at least one error with > > -pedantic-errors, and at least one warning or error with -pedantic. > > There may be less consistency in what's a warning / error if -pedantic > > rather than -pedantic-errors is used. > > So merely using -pedantic may produce errors that do not appear without > -pedantic? Is that really a desired behavior? Not desired, but considered less important than the main concerns for these options that I listed above.
