http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59203
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #1) > Thanks for catching, yep, s/t1/t2/ there. You are welcome. > Not sure why you mean by code rework, looks otherwise clear to me. I am not familiar with the code, so if the code is clear to you, then proceed with s/t1/t2.
