http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57129
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > > However, the error message is now different from before for the test case > > in comment 0 and this reduction: > > Confirmed. AFAICT the error message with 4.6 comes from gcc/fortran/symbol.c > while the present one comes from gcc/fortran/dec.c. To me it looks like they both come from symbol.c, don't they? > I have changed the summary to reflect the present situation. Should we keep > the regression flags? The wrong wording of the error message is still a regression (though not as severe as the ICE), so I guess we should keep the regression flag.
