http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59193
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
a++ and ++a should be treated as similar and don't change the semantics of the
loading from the variable or increase the number of loads if never used for
scalar types. Now in C++, they are different when you overload them for
classes but we don't use that feature yet.