https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61013

--- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ccoutant from comment #10)
> Sorry, I'm not sure what "both points" are. Does that mean that you
> would support changing -g so that -g1 -g means -g2, but -g3 -g means
> -g3? (I.e., -g will raise the level to 2 but will not lower it.)

Yes, that's what I meant.

Reply via email to