https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61013
--- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to ccoutant from comment #10) > Sorry, I'm not sure what "both points" are. Does that mean that you > would support changing -g so that -g1 -g means -g2, but -g3 -g means > -g3? (I.e., -g will raise the level to 2 but will not lower it.) Yes, that's what I meant.