https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62245
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> --- (In reply to Julian Taylor from comment #2) > mips is the only architecture with this behavior, all others behave as > documented. > Shouldn't that be reason enough to change mips? > if not please document the exception on mips. Not quite, for example on x86 (additionally writing a): ./a.out 1e99 is Infinity -2147483648 (note sign). It is just undefined behavior. I assume mips results are correct if the input real fits the range of the integer ?
