https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64008
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I configured for sh4-linux, foolishly thinking that sh4-nofpu would work with that as well. Why not build all "regular" multilibs for every "regular" config? Maybe keep sh5, sh2a separate, I dunno (I note that sh2a-nofpu is built for sh1 and sh2 configs, but not e.g. sh3 or sh4, or sh2a itself! Truly strange stuff. I suspect it makes sense in that it builds a minimal amount of multilibs and then supports everything it can with that, but that does not make terribly much sense from the viewpoint of a user).