https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- However with that patch the caught pointer is not null, so it's not right.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- However with that patch the caught pointer is not null, so it's not right.