https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64678
Bug ID: 64678
Summary: Expected association error on dependent associate
statements
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: antony at cosmologist dot info
In trunk
module X
Type T
integer :: map
end Type T
contains
subroutine DoBug
Type(T) TT
associate(A=>TT, B=>A%map)
end associate
end subroutine
end module X
gives:
testbug.f90:10:17:
associate(A=>TT, B=>A%map)
1
Error: Expected association at (1)
testbug.f90:11:4:
end associate
1
It's not entirely clear to me from the standard if this is allowed, but I don't
see why not (useful when you are breaking up complicated array/class structures
into associate names, where the second name refers to the first). It compiles
in ifort. Obviously low priority as can be worked around easily enough
