https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64843
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |documentation, wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-01-28
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |5.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The documentation indeed suggests this:
"These built-in functions perform the operation suggested by the name, and
return the value that had previously been in @code{*@var{ptr}}. That is,
@smallexample
@{ tmp = *ptr; *ptr @var{op}= val; return tmp; @}
@end smallexample"
thus here
*(&p) += 1;
Whether the bug is in documentation or code is another question. Confirmed
that the testcase produces cited assembly on x86_64 and some older trunk.
