https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65342
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6) > Created attachment 35001 [details] > workaround > > You might like to consider this patch that effectively reverts r210201 for > Darwin. This should cure the regression. Yeah. I did something similar as a fall-back .. but (unless we run out of time) I'd rather fix the underlying problem - since it occurs in other places too. [if we do run out of time, then I'm fine with applying the fallback].
