https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64705
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to amker from comment #6) > Since it works on gcc 3.4, so I consider this as a regression and applied > the patch. Should be fixed now. > > Hi Vlad, could you please help me verify that the original benchmark is > fixed too? Thanks very much! Yes, it was fixed. Thanks for working on this.
