https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|5.0 |6.0
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think that fixing the third case is going to be harder, and doesn't look like
something that should be fixed in cp/constexpr.c.
While fold_comparison is able to fold the NE_EXPR here:
constexpr char s1[] = "s1";
constexpr char s2[] = "s2";
constexpr auto eq = (s2 + 2) != (s2 + 1);
it isn't able to fold it here:
constexpr char s1[] = "s1";
constexpr char s2[] = "s2";
constexpr auto eq = (s1 + 2) != (s2 + 1);
So not sure what to do here, but in any case, I think it is a GCC 6 material.
