https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65808
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David L. from comment #2)
> Hm. It doesn't seem to produce a warning for the system's/glibc's wait()
> definition, even though there is no __extension__ on that. I guess that's
> special-handling for system headers(?)
Yes, likely: if you put the declarations in your test case into a header file
along with #pragma GCC system_header, you won't see any warnings.
I'm marking this as resolved. If anyone thinks I'm wrong, please reopen.
