https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org            |

--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> > > IMO implementing the diagnostic pragmas in gfortran will just be a waste 
> > > of
> > > time. Thus if someone want to close this PR as WONTFIX, I won't object!
> >
> > Why? Doesn't Fortran have pragmas?
> 
> Yes indeed, but I don't see the use (interest) of diagnostic pragmas in
> gfortran.
> I am pretty sure that this PR will rot forever.

Oh, well, that is up to Fortran devs and users. (I'm pretty sure many people
said that about C/C++ diagnostic pragmas until they started to be widely use.)

Reply via email to