https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > > > IMO implementing the diagnostic pragmas in gfortran will just be a waste > > > of > > > time. Thus if someone want to close this PR as WONTFIX, I won't object! > > > > Why? Doesn't Fortran have pragmas? > > Yes indeed, but I don't see the use (interest) of diagnostic pragmas in > gfortran. > I am pretty sure that this PR will rot forever. Oh, well, that is up to Fortran devs and users. (I'm pretty sure many people said that about C/C++ diagnostic pragmas until they started to be widely use.)