https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #45 from Jon Grant <jg at jguk dot org> --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #39) > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #38) > > It could even be the case that the "potential NULL" code gets > > put into some backwater flag away from -Wall, and, after a suitable period > > of more testing, the "definately NULL" code gets to go into > > prime time of -Wall. > > We could split the flag into -Wnull-dereference and -Wmaybe-null-dereference. Sounds good. I'm keen to see it in :)
