https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641 > > --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > > OTOH I'd just use it as an excuse to drop init-regs.c ... > > It has a rather big comment explaining why it was needed though. Handwaving ones w/o testcase and appearantly without making sure such uses never get re-introduced after it (and the offending un-named places)
