https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #12) > The statement in fortran/trans-intrinsic.c > > gfc_copy_formal_args_intr (sym, expr->value.function.isym, > ignore_optional ? expr->value.function.actual > : NULL); > > looks suspicious: if ignore_optional means what indicated by the name and is > true, why passing expr->value.function.actual and NULL otherwise? > Seeing how the argument is used would tell you the answer. ;-)
