https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
--- Comment #77 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #72) > > Patch as posted passed bootstrap & regtest. Adjusted according to > comments but not tested otherwise - please somebody throw at > unpatched 416.gamess. Still miscompares on aarch64, I'm afraid. (Both with and without -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations.) Also where Jakub wrote: > If you want to go this way, I'd at least key it off DECL_COMMON on the decl. > And instead of multiplying max_size by 2 perhaps just add BITS_PER_UNIT? I wonder why you prefer setting such an arbitrary guess at max_size rather than going with -1 which is defined as "unknown" ?
