https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70018
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oh I see pure/const behavior.
The problem is more complex, in that in one TU, the comdat function is figured
out to be pure/const so we remove the store before the function call. While in
the other we don't. Now we got a comdat function which is pure in one TU while
not in the other case. We use the non pure version of the comdat function.
I thought this was fixed in 6.
