https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70219
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Created attachment 37953 [details] > gcc6-pr70219.patch > > Untested fix. The code had assertion dregno > 0, but I don't see anything > special on register 0 (%rax on x86_64), assuming Vlad meant >= 0 here (i.e. > make sure dregno is not negative, which is not a hard register, but has > special meaning). Yes, I meant >=0. I am really sorry for such obvious mistake. I was to distracted to other things. Jakub, could submit your patch.
