https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #31 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Does anyone have handy logs for: FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C -std=gnu++11 execution test FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C -std=gnu++14 execution test FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C -std=gnu++98 execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/nest.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/nested-func-4.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/pr32450.c execution test FAIL: gcc.target/i386/mcount_pic.c execution test (all with -m32). handy for -m32 before things broke originally? I'm wondering if these are regressions from that time? If they were present, we can close this PR with the bug fix. If not, I'd like to keep this open (unless someone wants to file a new PR and link to think one for the details. If we don't know, let's keep it open for now til someone can investigate.