https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70362
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #6) > Fails at O0 in this case, I cannot type. I still think this is a tail from > PR62254 and that should just be reopened. I cannot reproduce this failure. Ie when I compile this test case everything works, at -O0 all the way up to -O3. This is with today's mainline sources, which has *both* of the patches from PR 62254 applied. These sources no longer contain this assertion: gcc_assert (REG_P (operands[0])); although they do contain: gcc_assert (REG_P (outval) || SUBREG_P (outval)); If the problem really does exist, could someone tell me what outval looks like when the assertion is triggered ? Cheers Nick
