https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71150
Jiong Wang <jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target| |i386* Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang <jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org> --- r236181 was assuming SUBREG_REG (x) is a REG, but actually it might be not, at least for i386. A simple new guard of REG_P check can fix this regression. Will explore more to see what's the best fix and propose a patch shortly.