https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to David B. Robins from comment #12) > Note that it does still need -fno-inline. I almost missed. > I know why it doesn't crash with -O0: there is a text-section constant > inserted after the thunk, and it's inlined at higher optimization levels. > The instruction said constant maps to is either harmless or forbidden as a > delay slot instruction. So the underlying issue still occurs but the crash > doesn't. Ah, ok, thanks for the analysis. > I am OK with my name/email being included in the ChangeLog, thank you. Great. BTW, I'm keeping the PR open, pending back-ports to open branches. Thanks again!
