Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
           Keywords|                            |lto
             Target|                            |arm
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2016-09-21
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot> ---
Unless you can provide a complete testcase that compiles to sth executable it's
not possible to help you in debugging this.

LTO may cause static variable constructors to run in a different order than
when not using LTO (but they still behave according to the language rules
which basically make ordering unspecififed AFAIR).

Reply via email to