https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Ross from comment #26) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23) > > (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #22) > > > When a fix is designed, could you please backport it to the 6 branch (so > > > it > > > can make it into 6.3 for example)? It is also affected. > > > > sure, "all open branches" would be the intent. > > I can confirm that 5.3 is also affected. OK. so the status is - we're checking for other test-cases that need amendment. - IMO this is a sufficiently invasive change that it needs testing on some bigger chunks of code - likewise across a representative set of the *darwin* patch * I will check ppc-d9 when I'm back in the office; with both ld-85.2.1 and my back ported ld64-253.9 * I think Dominique will check x86_64-d10. feel free to volunteer to do some similar testing of builds of larger codes (e.g. python or LLVM etc). * I'll do back-ports for 6.x and 5.x early next week, traveling until then.
