--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> It'll be hard to "fix" the first testcase:
> <>.


The testcase from comment 3 is a dup of pr77886 and fixed by 
the patch that Jakub posted there.

So if there is already an existing bug for the first testcase,
feel free to close this bug.

Reply via email to