https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78024 > > Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Keywords| |patch > > --- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to myself from comment #3) > > I'll have a look later today, but if someone is able to do so now, please > > verify whether <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg01478.html> > > does fix this issue? > > It does. Asking once again: OK to commit? > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > > Well, must be another missing BB_VISITED clearing then. > > I wonder why you didn't see that regression in your testing? I did but didn't thought it was my patch (oacc should be unrelated). I also assumed the posted patch was already committed (as I approved it)