https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
--- Comment #28 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #26) > Created attachment 40233 [details] > d_print_comp with 1 level of recursion protection > > This is the variant that allows 1 level of recursion (with an xxx ??? to why > 1 level). Plus various symbols added to demangle-expected from PRs that used > to crash the demangler because of endless recursion. > > The question now is whether this really is a good fix or if some of these > symbols really should demangle to something meaningful. It is always better not to crash. Please also note that Nathan's lambda demangling patch needs adjustments, because with level 1 of recursion it prints everything twice.
