https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79202
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #2) > Can we instead do: > > xscvdpsxws 32,1 > vupkhsw 1,0 > xvcvsxwdp 3,33 Replying to myself, the answer is no, the vupkhsw doesn't write its results in the correct words for xvcvsxwdp.