https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80178
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm, I don't see anything in the ABI about deleted constructors, and a deleted
function isn't non-trivial (nor trivial).
That said, I agree that it makes sense for a class with only deleted copy/move
ctors to be passed by invisible reference in the case of
copy-list-initialization.
