https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7) > Comment on attachment 41252 [details] > gcc8-pr80501.patch > > > && exact_log2 (UINTVAL (XEXP (inner, 1))) > >- >= GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode)))) > >+ >= GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) - 1))) > > This can be written as "> GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode)". No, >= GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) + 1 could be written as > GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode)
