https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80859
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't see any attachments. The target directives can't be ignored, some
clauses have significant role even when doing host fallback (data sharing).
Plus the question is what do you mean by no offloading. Do you mean compiler
configured without any offloading support, or compiler configured with
offloading support, but with offloading not selected, or by compiler with
offloading support and offloading generated, but at runtime deciding it has to
use host fallback?
E.g. the second case, the decision whether offloading will be supported or not
is not done at compile time, but at link time, where one can choose whether to
emit offloading or not and to which subset of the configured offloading
targets.
