https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80859
--- Comment #26 from Thorsten Kurth <thorstenkurth at me dot com> --- Hello Jakub, thanks for the clarification. So a team maps to a CTA which is somewhat equivalent to a block in CUDA language, correct? And it is good to have some categorical equivalency between GPU and CPU code (SIMD units <> WARPS) instead of mapping SIMT threads to OpenMP threads, that makes it easier for making it portable. About my mapping "problem" is there an elegant way for doing this or does only brute force work, i.e. by writing additional member functions returning pointers etc.? In general, the OpenMP mapping business is very verbose (not your fault, I know), it makes the code very annoying to read. Best Thorsten
