https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81538
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-07-25, at 2:46 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > Both gcc-5 and gcc-6 are broken. Take that back; only gcc-6 is broken. I incorrectly set the package up for gcc-5 in my first attempt and it used gcc-6. -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net