https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 41894
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41894&action=edit
result of compiling with -ftime-report -ftime-report-details -fstats
(In reply to Larry Evans from comment #10)
> Created attachment 28294 [details]
> with optimized clang, still with optimized gcc, both with -O1
>
> Remade clang with make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1. Clang times improved a lot.
>
> Now, the degradation of relative performance of gcc w.r.t. clang
> is more dramatic.
>
> Still, gcc does better at low LAST_LESS, but reaches break even
> at lower LAST_LESS (about 8).
Confirmed:
$ /usr/local/bin/gcc -c -O1 -time tuple.benchmark.mini.horiz.cpp
# cc1plus 4.62 0.25
# as 0.02 0.01
$
I guess 4 and a half seconds is kinda long. Attaching a more detailed time
report as a separate file.
