https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81778
Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2017-08-09
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I agree that simd loop in the presented testcase is mishandled, but fwiw the
original for-5.c testcase should not exhibit this issue with loop counter
wraparound; the root cause must have been different in the original failure you
were seeing.
