Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2017-08-09
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot> ---
I agree that simd loop in the presented testcase is mishandled, but fwiw the
original for-5.c testcase should not exhibit this issue with loop counter
wraparound; the root cause must have been different in the original failure you
were seeing.

Reply via email to