https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702
--- Comment #6 from Adam Lackorzynski <adam at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de> ---
So assuming removing the assert is ok, the following would address it:
--- gimple-fold.c (revision 254205)
+++ gimple-fold.c (working copy)
@@ -6439,7 +6439,6 @@
gcc_assert (init);
if (init == error_mark_node)
{
- gcc_assert (in_lto_p);
/* Pass down that we lost track of the target. */
if (can_refer)
*can_refer = false;
Do you think this could be applied?
