https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82853
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2017-11-05
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #5)
> Also I'm not sure why you would want it in the middle end. It should all
> work at the tree level
Because we lose meaning and there is already code to handle the %N (where N is
a constant) to a multiplication in the middle-end so reusing that code would be
easy. Plus 0 is simpler than 0x55555556.
