https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82847
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82847 > > > > rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org > > > > --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot > > gnu.org> --- > > Isn't the problem here that vect_perm_byte and vect_perm_short don't return > > true for x86_64, even though the patterns seem to be there in sse.md? > > vect_perm_byte is only available with SSEn+ > > The test only uses vect_perm_short though. Sure, fixing only vect_perm_short would be enough for this PR. I just meant that the same problem seems to apply to vect_perm_byte too.
