https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I filed this bug report after I bisected, so the regression I saw was caused by r254379. It's still present with r255848.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I filed this bug report after I bisected, so the regression I saw was caused by r254379. It's still present with r255848.